Connected Data Fault Detection

Fuse multi-modal signals into one intelligent view and auto-link anomalies to failure modes. Forecast critical drifts 7-14 days in advance with ≥90% precision.

Challenge

Engineering teams juggle fragmented data across vibration, temperature, pressure gas flow, controller logs, and process parameters. Signals sit in separate historians, MES SCADA, and log files with inconsistent clocks, units, and naming. Root causes often span cross domain interactions, such as chamber pressure plus heater drift indicating a sticking valve. Investigations take days and rely on tribal knowledge and manual overlays—delaying fixes and masking true failure modes.

The objective: fuse multi modal signals into one intelligent view and auto link anomalies to failure modes. Forecast critical drifts 7–14 days in advance with ≥90% precision, cut time to root cause by ≥60%, and auto tag ≥70% of anomalies with interpretable explanations and compliant system updates.

Solution: How AIP changed the operating model

Learning and setup

Powered by the Aftermarket Intelligence Platform AIP, the agentic solution applied predictive, forecasting, and policy models with ontology driven graph reasoning, multivariate time series anomaly detection, causal inference, and drift detection. Training data came from historical signals, controller and equipment logs, alarm and event history, SPC and FDC data, recipe and setpoint changes, maintenance tickets, calibration records, and OEM manuals mapped to the ontology. The agent recognizes tag names, timestamps and rates, units, tool and chamber IDs, recipe and lot IDs, setpoints and limits, alarm codes, work orders, and operator notes.

Connected Data Fault Detection Training Data and Models workflow diagram

Workflow orchestration

The AI agent analyzes incoming signals, extracts identifiers, and determines the correct workflow path: align clocks, normalize units, correlate signals, test causal drivers, forecast drift, or open a maintenance action. It navigates historians, MES SCADA, CMMS ERP, and the data lake, mirroring the steps a reliability engineer would follow. Orchestration logic branches when rules apply—for example, suppress alerts if the anomaly aligns with a planned recipe change, or escalate when a protected limit is breached—while ensuring compliance at every step.

Connected Data Fault Detection Solution architecture diagram

Execution and resolution

The AI agent validates and resamples streams, de noises, extracts features, detects multivariate anomalies, discovers correlations and causal drivers, forecasts drifts, maps patterns to failure modes, and generates ranked, explainable recommendations. Results arrive in minutes, with work orders and dashboards updated across connected systems. Exceptions—such as sensor faults, missing tags, excessive clock drift, or low model confidence—are routed to engineers with full context attached.

Connected Data Fault Detection Workflow execution diagram

Results

65%
Drop in time to root cause
7-14 days
Early warning with ≥90% precision and ≤10% false positives
20%
Fewer repeat failures through targeted, interpretable fixes

Related Installed Base Management Use Cases

Defect Source Tracing Remaining Useful Life Prediction Real-Time Anomaly Detection Predictive Maintenance Scheduling Failure Pattern Recognition Digital Twin Quality Monitoring