Developer Guide: Implementing AI Warranty Systems for Semiconductor Manufacturing

Semiconductor OEMs face warranty claims complexity at fab scale—build flexible validation without proprietary lock-in.

In Brief

Integrate AI warranty validation using REST APIs and Python SDKs. Connect to ERP systems for entitlement verification, automate claim coding with custom rules, and deploy fraud detection models without vendor lock-in.

Integration Challenges in Semiconductor Warranty Systems

Legacy ERP Entitlement Lookups

Warranty entitlement data sits in SAP or Oracle systems that require custom connectors. Off-the-shelf warranty platforms force migration to their database schemas, breaking existing integrations with fab MES and supply chain systems.

6-12 months Integration timeline for closed platforms

Inflexible Claim Validation Rules

Semiconductor warranty logic varies by tool type, process node, and customer contract terms. Black-box AI systems cannot adapt to recipe-specific failure modes or consumable lifecycle rules unique to lithography versus etch equipment.

40% Claims requiring manual override in rigid systems

Vendor Lock-In on Fraud Detection Models

Proprietary fraud detection algorithms cannot incorporate fab-specific telemetry patterns or be retrained as new failure modes emerge. When the vendor's model fails, you have no recourse to tune parameters or add custom features.

3-5 years Average contract lock-in period

Headless Warranty AI Architecture for Semiconductor OEMs

Bruviti provides API-first warranty intelligence that integrates with your existing ERP, MES, and analytics stack. The platform exposes RESTful endpoints for entitlement verification, claim coding, and fraud scoring—allowing you to keep warranty data in SAP while adding AI validation on top. Python and TypeScript SDKs let you build custom workflows that call pre-trained models for defect classification from SEM images or NFF prediction based on tool telemetry.

The architecture separates data storage from intelligence layer. You control where warranty records, customer contracts, and equipment history reside. Bruviti APIs consume JSON payloads with claim details and return structured validation results, confidence scores, and suggested disposition codes. For fraud detection, you can configure rule thresholds, whitelist known failure modes, and retrain models using your proprietary fab data without exposing sensitive process parameters to external systems.

Developer Benefits

  • Deploy API endpoints in 2-4 weeks versus 6-12 months for monolithic platforms.
  • Reduce integration costs by 60% using standard REST calls instead of custom connectors.
  • Retain model flexibility to retrain fraud detection on fab-specific failure patterns.

See It In Action

Implementation for Semiconductor OEMs

API Integration Architecture

Semiconductor warranty systems must connect to SAP ECC or S/4HANA for equipment install base, Oracle EBS for customer contracts, and fab MES for tool performance history. Bruviti's REST APIs consume warranty claim payloads with serial numbers, failure codes, and telemetry snapshots—then return entitlement status, suggested disposition, and fraud risk scores in milliseconds.

For defect validation, SEM or AFM images are uploaded via multipart POST requests to the image analysis endpoint. The API returns defect classification, confidence intervals, and whether the failure mode is covered under warranty terms. Python SDK examples show how to batch-process returned tool images overnight and flag claims requiring human review based on confidence thresholds you define.

Deployment Considerations

  • Start with one tool type like CVD reactors to validate API integration before scaling to full portfolio.
  • Connect SAP install base via OData feeds and Oracle contracts via REST to unify entitlement lookups.
  • Track NFF rate reduction and claim processing time over 90 days to prove ROI before expanding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What data format does the warranty validation API accept?

The API accepts JSON payloads containing claim ID, equipment serial number, failure description, customer ID, and warranty contract reference. Optional fields include telemetry snapshots, SEM image URLs, and repair history. Response includes entitlement boolean, confidence score, suggested disposition code, and fraud risk level.

Can I retrain fraud detection models on my fab data?

Yes. Bruviti provides model retraining APIs where you submit labeled training data containing historical claims with fraud/valid flags. The platform fine-tunes the base model on your data and returns a custom model endpoint. You control the training data and model weights remain in your deployment environment.

How do I integrate with SAP for entitlement verification?

Use SAP OData services to expose install base and contract tables as REST endpoints. Bruviti SDKs include helper functions to query SAP, cache entitlement data in Redis, and pass relevant fields to the warranty validation API. Sample code shows SAP ECC and S/4HANA integration patterns with error handling.

What image formats are supported for defect detection?

The image analysis API accepts TIFF, PNG, and JPEG formats common in SEM and AFM output. Maximum resolution is 4096x4096 pixels. API returns defect bounding boxes, classification labels, and confidence scores. Batch processing endpoints allow uploading up to 100 images per request for overnight analysis.

How long does API deployment take for a pilot program?

Initial API integration typically takes 2-4 weeks including ERP connector setup, claim payload mapping, and testing with historical data. Pilot programs start with one product line to validate accuracy before scaling. SDKs include unit tests and mock endpoints to accelerate development without production data dependencies.

Related Articles

Build Your Warranty Integration Proof of Concept

Get API documentation, Python SDK, and sandbox environment access to test warranty validation with your data.

Access Developer Resources